| |
◄
Background Main |
Click
here for a print (pdf)
version of this information.
Colorado’s
national forests provide habitat, forage, shelter, and water for a remarkable
abundance of wildlife. Protection of roadless areas — the last unspoiled
portions of our National Forests — helps ensure the continued strength and
vitality of wildlife. The presence of robust wildlife populations is integral to
Colorado’s economy, environment, and recreational opportunities.
|

Roadless areas provide essential
habitat for a broad range of species.
Colorado Division of Wildlife |
Hunting and Big Game Habitat
Roads reduce both the size and ecological health of wildlife habitats of a
number of species, including popular game species such as elk and deer that are
so important to Colorado’s hunting traditions.
-
Recreation in large
protected areas free of roads and other disturbances contribute to
Colorado’s economy, bringing thousands of local and
out-of-state visitors to National Forest roadless areas every year.
In 2004, almost $2.3 billion was spent in Colorado by hunters,
anglers, and wildlife watchers. Total spending in Colorado on
outdoor equipment and gear that same year was $1.3 billion. (1)
-
Elk populations
decline with increased density of roads open to motor vehicles. Research has found that two
miles of roads per square mile leads to a 50% reduction in elk
populations, while six miles of roads per square mile eradicates
virtually all elk in that area. (2)
-
Deer hunting
opportunities may be significantly reduced as roads are developed in
what is currently undisturbed backcountry. Restricting use of
existing roads and enforcing limitations on building new roads can
be important parts of improving buck deer age diversity. (3)
|

Fishing, hunting,
and wildlife-watching are time-honored Colorado traditions.
Colorado
Division of Wildlife |
Fishing and Wildlife
Watching
Both recreational anglers and successful fisheries depend on reliable sources of
clean water and minimal stream channel disruptions that result from motor
crossings, pollution, and accelerated erosion. Therefore, protecting roadless
areas is important for providing both fishing opportunities and a source of clean water downstream. In addition to providing some of the best
native fisheries in the state, roadless areas offer some of the more exciting
wildlife viewing opportunities as well.
-
Trout fishing in
Colorado attracts and challenges anglers daily. In addition to
offering unbeatable fishing close to home for local citizens,
Colorado’s clean and healthy streams are waded by thousands of fly
rod visitors each year. The recreational value of quality fishing
streams is enormous; one study in Colorado’s Upper Gunnison River
Basin reported streamflow value estimates for recreation at $810 to
$940 per acre-foot. (4)
-
“Several important
Colorado game and non-game species, including elk, bighorn sheep,
and black bear, exhibit road avoidance or rely on remoteness from
human activity as a key habitat characteristic.” (5) Even road-side
wildlife viewing depends on animals’ ability to enjoy large and
healthy habitat well away from roads.
|

Large, unbroken tracts of
undisturbed habitat have been
|critical to the successful re-introduction of the endangered
Canada lynx in Colorado.
Colorado Division of Wildlife |
Habitat Fragmentation
Over the past 150 years, expanded road networks and other encroachments on the
landscape have increased the fragmentation and destruction of natural habitats.
Such disturbances to the land are isolating many areas important to wildlife,
creating “islands” in a sea of inhospitable habitat. (6) Roadless areas on
national forests, as some of the largest tracts of relatively undisturbed land
in the country, are often regarded by wildlife experts as
critical linkages
between “islands,” allowing wildlife relatively undisturbed land through which
they can migrate and in which they can find refuge.
-
Smaller, more
isolated roadless areas may contain rare species, protect certain
dwindling habitat types, and function as stepping stones or
corridors to connect larger pieces of conservation lands. (7)
-
More than one-third
of inventoried roadless areas in National Forests are adjacent to
federal conservation units — places like National Wildlife Refuges,
National Parks, and Wilderness. By protecting larger complexes of
land, we increase the viability of wildlife populations by
facilitating migration and protecting interior habitats that have
minimal disturbance. Preservation of the remaining roadless lands
will increase the ability of conservation lands to support wildlife
and the natural processes important to them.
Protecting
Colorado’s Diverse Species Roadless areas provide key wildlife
habitat by providing networks of large intact areas needed by
wide-ranging animals like elk and black bears. They also provide the
diversity of ecosystems needed for shorter-ranging species of birds,
mammals, reptiles, and amphibians, including at-risk species such as the
boreal toad. Because of their size and location, roadless areas contain
enormous potential for the conservation of the native biodiversity so
important to Colorado’s traditions and economy.
-
“Inventoried
roadless areas alone and/or in combination with protected areas
(e.g., Wilderness) function as biological strongholds supporting a
diversity of species. Biological strongholds play a key role in
maintaining native species and biodiversity.” (8) A 2000 study
showed that currently only 3 of Colorado’s major ecosystem types
have 10% or more of their acreage in a protective status; by
conferring protection to roadless areas, 10 of the 13 ecosystems
would have at least 10% of their total area in a protective status.
(9)
-
Ecologists and
wildlife managers suggest that a full range of ecological
communities and elevation ranges should be protected. Currently,
about 70% of Colorado’s well-protected lands lie at or above 10,000
feet. To protect Colorado’s full suite of biodiversity, we should
try to confer high levels of protection to large undisturbed areas
at a mix of lower elevations, as well. (10)
|
|
1 Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2004
2 Lyon, L.J. (1983). Road density models describing habitat
effectiveness for elk. Journal of Forestry 81: 592-595.
3 Mackie, Pac, Hamlin, & Dusek
4 Moskowitz, K and Talberth, J. 1998. The Economic Case Against Logging
Our National Forests. Forest Guardians, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
5 Forest Service Roadless Area Conservation Final EIS 3-144 (2000)
6 Harris, L.D. 1984. The Fragmented Forest: Island Biogeography Theory
and the Preservation of Biotic Diversity. Chicago, IL: University of
Chicago Press.
7 Strittholt and DellaSala 2001
8 Forest Service Roadless Area Conservation Final EIS 3-125 (2000)
9 Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project. 2004. The State of the Southern
Rockies Ecoregion. Colorado Mountain Club: Golden, Colorado.
10 Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project. 2004. The State of the Southern
Rockies Ecoregion. Colorado Mountain Club: Golden, Colorado. |